Register Already!

Blogroll

RSS My Lime Green Book

  • It’s funny how things work
    The importance of understanding “the why” (purpose) has occupied much of my thinking lately. One of my projects at work is to develop a training module on infrastructure reconnaissance.  One of the themes I’m trying to emphasize in the module … Continue reading → […]

RSS GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnD

  • Collapse Of Araby
    Surprise!Check a bit of interesting chiz from a bona fided "Run away! Run away!" cat (He certainly didn't think like this in his ancient readable thing filled up with paper  LOL)Anywrought - Arab League is like totally kaput - and true and faux regional unArabic hegemons are sweetly circling  overheadThe Arab Spring has unleashed the Arab Coll […]

RSS Rethinking Security

  • Administrative Shift
    Over the next week, there will be some big changes at Rethinking Security. First, I will be moving this blog to Tumblr. I've been blogging for five years now, and have been learning about the business as I go along.... […]

RSS Mountain Runner

  • Public Diplomacy: Books, Articles, Websites #62
    Courtesy of Bruce Gregory, here is the latest update on resources that may be of general interest for teachers, students, and practitioners of public diplomacy and related courses and activities. Suggestions for future updates are welcome. Bruce Gregory is an adjunct professor at George Washington University and at Georgetown University and a pre-eminant fon […]

RSS Abu Muqawama

  • I Got 200 Million Problems, But Multicollinearity Ain't One
    When even David Brooks, Herodotus of the Bobos, is waxing lyrical about data and empiricism you know that data science has become mainstream. Drew Conway is right that the phrase is rather clumsy, but so are many other things in social science. If the mad awesome/state of the art work Conway does is the data equivalent of the mouth-watering Chinese restauran […]

RSS Long War Journal

RSS The War Report

RSS Real Clear World

  • U.S. Braces for More Afghan 'Insider' Attacks
    Bill Gertz, DC Free BeaconTaliban insurgents recently vowed to carry out new “infiltration” attacks aimed at killing and demoralizing U.S., allied, and Afghan military forces as part of the spring military offensive, according to U.S. officials. The expected increase in what the Pentagon calls “insider” attacks by Taliban sympathizers […]

Categories

Archives

Army Learning Concept 2015

Country Views

free counters

Never start a land war in Asia.

Do I really need a caption? I think the picture says it all.

Wow, I find it amazing that the more I work the less connected to current events I become. As I pour myself into a project my awareness seems to degrade exponentially. I don’t like it- degrading awareness that is. I generally like to work.
I’ve watched bits and pieces of the intervention in Libya unfold and wish I could dedicate more time to analyzing it in depth. I do find it interesting that the President has committed military forces in a manner that he had railed against prior to the invasion of Iraq. It makes me wonder what our strategic rationale is for commitment of military assets. Is it for the national interest, security or Values based? If it is values based why not Saudi Arabia, Syria, North Korea or Burma? All are different forms of tyranny and all mistreat their people (at least in a western sense of human rights). Is our use of military assets simply based on which political part of the spectrum you fall on? What I mean is, if your case for military action is based on “humanitarian” reasons such as Bosnia, Somalia and Libya then you line up to the left and the players on the left simply support you without question?
I’m not bashing the current decisions that have been made. You can make a similar case for the polarization that ensued during the invasion of Iraq. The right supported President Bush and the left decried the illegal war. The same thing is happening now but it is the right calling foul and the left making the case for action. Perhaps I am becoming jaded but playing partisan politics with military actions is unhealthy for our country. We risk making our foreign policies even less coherent than it already is. Our credibility as a nation suffers because our actions do not align with our stated values. If we believe brutal regimes that violate human rights must fall then why do we support the Saudis? We know why we support the Saudis- they have oil and we have no real energy strategy to make us independent from Saudi oil. That leaves us at odds with our values and our national interest (keep the oil coming). At what point do we begin to reassess our national strategy to ensure our national interest are congruent with our national values? Until that day comes we will always appear as hypocrites to the rest of the world.


27 Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.